The Role of Aceh Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Addressing Past Human Rights Violations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58824/mediasas.v8i4.459Keywords:
KKR Aceh, reconciliation , transitional justice, human rights normative–empirical studyAbstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of KKR Aceh as a localized mechanism of transitional justice, particularly in promoting truth-seeking, victim rehabilitation, and reconciliation. Employing a normative–empirical legal approach, the research analyzes both the regulatory foundations and the practical implementation of KKR Aceh’s mandate as outlined in Law No. 11 of 2006 on the Governance of Aceh and Qanun Aceh No. 17 of 2013. Data were obtained from statutory regulations, official reports, and scholarly literature. The normative analysis focuses on the institutional design, legal legitimacy, and alignment of KKR Aceh with Indonesia’s constitutional principles and international human rights standards. Meanwhile, the empirical analysis evaluates its achievements in documenting human rights abuses, organizing public hearings, and recommending reparations for victims. The findings indicate that KKR Aceh has made substantial progress in restoring victims’ dignity and encouraging societal healing. However, its capacity remains limited due to legal, financial, and institutional challenges, including dependency on special autonomy funds and lack of coordination with national agencies. The study concludes that reinforcing KKR Aceh’s legal framework, ensuring continuous funding, and integrating reconciliation education are vital for strengthening transitional justice and sustaining peace in Aceh.
[Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menilai efektivitas KKR Aceh sebagai mekanisme keadilan transisional di tingkat lokal, terutama dalam memajukan pengungkapan kebenaran, pemulihan korban, dan rekonsiliasi sosial. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan hukum normatif-empiris, penelitian ini menganalisis landasan hukum serta implementasi praktis mandat KKR Aceh sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintahan Aceh dan Qanun Aceh Nomor 17 Tahun 2013. Data penelitian diperoleh dari peraturan perundang-undangan, laporan resmi, dan literatur akademik. Analisis normatif menitikberatkan pada legitimasi hukum, desain kelembagaan, serta kesesuaian KKR Aceh dengan prinsip konstitusi dan standar hak asasi manusia internasional. Sementara itu, analisis empiris menilai pencapaian lembaga ini dalam mendokumentasikan pelanggaran HAM, menyelenggarakan sidang kesaksian publik, serta memberikan rekomendasi reparasi bagi korban. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa KKR Aceh telah berkontribusi signifikan dalam memulihkan martabat korban dan memperkuat rekonsiliasi sosial. Namun, efektivitasnya masih terbatas akibat kendala hukum, keuangan, dan kelembagaan, termasuk ketergantungan pada dana otonomi khusus dan lemahnya koordinasi dengan lembaga nasional. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa penguatan dasar hukum, dukungan pendanaan berkelanjutan, dan pendidikan rekonsiliasi diperlukan untuk memperkuat keadilan transisional dan menjaga perdamaian di Aceh.]
Downloads
References
Aceh Truth and Reconciliation Commission. (2025). Peulara Damèe: Nurturing Peace, Report on Findings of the Aceh Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Aceh Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
Afandi, F., & Bagaskoro, L. R. (2024). Islam and State’s Legal Pluralism: The Intersection of Qanun Jinayat and Criminal Justice System in Indonesia. Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman, 19(1), 1–26.
Akbar, K. (2017). Politik Hukum Pembentukan Komisi Kebenaran dan Rekonsiliasi Aceh. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 2(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol2.iss2.art11
Bakiner, O. (2021). Truth Commission Impact on Policy, Courts, and Society. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 17(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-111620-010000
Bekerman, Z., & Zembylas, M. (2011). Teaching Contested Narratives Identity, Memory and Reconciliation in Peace Education and Beyond. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139015646
Chavez, L. C., Pérez-León-Acevedo, J.-P., & García-Godos, J. (2019). The Presidential Pardon of Fujimori: Political Struggles in Peru and the Subsidiary Role of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 13(2), 328–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijz010
Ciorciari, J. D., & Heindel, A. (2017). Hybrid Justice: Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. In Cambodian Genocide The Essential Reference Guide. The University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009166478.010
de Greiff, P. (2021). The Applicability of Transitional Justice in Pre-Conflict Contexts. September, 1–30.
Downing, C., & Bodewig, R. (2024). Columbia Case Study, 2024 PBF Thematic Review: Synergies between Human Rights and Peacebuilding in PBF-supported Programming.
Eriani, D., Sa’diah, H., Dalila, B., Mawardi, C., & Faisal. (2024). The Aceh Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s Role in Investigating Alleged Human Rights Violations and Grave Human Rights Violations in Aceh. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 11(1), 456–464. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i1.5358
Fajriyah, N. I., Suwandi, S., & Rofiq, A. (2024). Government Legal Policy to Deal with Cases of Human Rights Violations in Indonesia. Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Politik Hukum, 13(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v13i1.23363
Fiedler, C. & Mross, K. (2023). Dealing With the Past for a Peaceful Future? Analysing the Effect of Transitional Justice Instruments on Trust in Postconflict Societies. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 17(2), 303–321, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijad010.
Gready, S. (2022). The Case for Transformative Reparations: In Pursuit of Structural Socio-Economic Reform in Post-Conflict Societies. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 16(2), 182–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2020.1852833
Hamzani, A. I., Widyastuti, T. V., Khasanah, N., & Rusli, M. H. M. (2024). Implementation approach in legal research. International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences, 13(2), 380–388. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijaas.v13.i2.pp380-388
Ihsan, R. N. (2024). Optics of Restorative Justice in the Criminal Justice Legal System in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Tambun Bungai, 9(2), 472–488. https://doi.org/10.61394/jihtb.v9i2.443
Ikhwan, Afrinal, Khalida, A., & Fatia, A. (2024). Resolving Human Rights Violation Cases In Aceh, Indonesia: Position and Role of Ulama. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 24(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v24i1.1539
KKR Aceh. (2021). LAPORAN PERKEMBANGAN KERJA (KINERJA) KOMISI KEBENARAN DAN REKONSILIASI ACEH PERIODE 2016 – 2021.
Lorion, S., & Murray, R. (2023). Interactions between National Human Rights Institutions and National Mechanisms for Implementation, Reporting and Follow-up: Research and Recommendations. In SSRN Electronic Journal. The Danish Institute for Human Rights. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4581246
Manan, M. (2015). Seeking Transitiona Justice in Indonesia: Lessons From the Cases of Aceh, Papua and East Timor. Constitutional Review, 1(2), 69–98. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev124
Martín, H. C., Wiebelhaus-Brahm, E., Nieto-Librero, A. B., & Wright, D. (2022). Explaining the timeliness of implementation of truth commission recommendations. Journal of Peace Research, 59(5), 710–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433211057011
Negara, T. A. S. (2023). Normative Legal Research in Indonesia: Its Originis and Approaches. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i1.24855
Niyitunga, E. B. (2024). Variables influencing truth reconciliation commissions to promote post-conflict peacebuilding and statebuilding in Africa: a South African experience. Frontiers in Political Science, 6(August), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1355951
Ramirez, M.P.P. & Wigender, L. (2025). Listening and Preparing the Society to Engage: The Case of the Colombian Truth Commission and Its Legacy Strategy. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 19(1). 174–182, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijae042
Reza Fahlevi, M., & Murziqin, R. (2024). Formulation of the Aceh Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) in Seeking the Truth about Past Human Rights Violations in Aceh. Proceedings of International Conference on Social Science, Political Science, and Humanities (ICoSPOLHUM), 4(17), 00037. https://doi.org/10.29103/icospolhum.v4i.466
Rossner, M., & Taylor, H. (2024). The Transformative Potential of Restorative Justice: What the Mainstream Can Learn from the Margins. Annual Review of Criminology, 7, 357–381. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030421-040921
Seth, S. (2025). Global South States and Transitional Justice: Beyond Politicization. The International Journal Of Transitional Justice, 00(00), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijaf015
Skaar, E., Gianella, C., & Eide, T. (2015). After Violence: Transitional Justice, Peace, and Democracy. Routledge.
Stan, L., & Nedelsky, N. (2023). Entries on Transitional Justice Debates, Controversies, and Key Questions. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108678537.004
Suh, J. (2015). Preemptive transitional justice policies in Aceh, Indonesia. Southeast Asian Studies, 4(1), 95–124.
Teitel, R. G. (2014). Globalizing Transitional Justice: Contemporary Essay. Oxford University Press.
Waghid, Z. (2024). Cultivating Critical Thinking, Social Justice Awareness and Empathy Among Pre-service Teachers Through Online Discussions on Global Citizenship Education. Journal of Creative Communications, 19(1), 74–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/09732586231194438
Wolfe, S. (2022). Reparations and the Role of Apologies. In The Oxford Handbook of Atrocity Crimes. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190915629.013.30
Yunus, M. (2022). Korban Penghilangan Paksa pada Konflik Aceh; Upaya Pemulihan dan Pemenuhan Hak Korban Melalui Mekanisme KKR Aceh. Jurnal Adabiya, 24(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.22373/adabiya.v24i1.12637
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Adam Juliandika, Jummaidi Saputra, Siti Rahmah, Anhar Nasution, Fazzan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












